Which argument type stresses the avoidance of the first step in a progression?

Which argument type stresses the avoidance of the first step in a progression?

• A. Enumeration argument
• B. Slippery slope argument
• C. Disjunctive argument
• D. Inclusive disjuncts

Answer: (B)

The slippery slope argument is an argument type that emphasizes the idea that taking a specific action could lead to an unwelcome progression of subsequent events. It suggests that if the first step is taken, it will inevitably lead to a series of negative consequences, culminating in a situation that is undesirable or harmful. This argument warns against initiating actions because it posits that the initial step will set off a chain reaction, making it crucial to avoid that first action to prevent further unwanted outcomes. In discussions or debates, this argument serves to highlight the potential dangers of seemingly minor decisions, making it important for participants to consider the broader implications of their choices. The slippery slope also requires the speaker to connect the dots between the initial action and the subsequent potential outcomes convincingly, making it a compelling rhetorical strategy in advocacy and debate contexts.

The slippery slope argument is an argument type that emphasizes the idea that taking a specific action could lead to an unwelcome progression of subsequent events. It suggests that if the first step is taken, it will inevitably lead to a series of negative consequences, culminating in a situation that is undesirable or harmful. This argument warns against initiating actions because it posits that the initial step will set off a chain reaction, making it crucial to avoid that first action to prevent further unwanted outcomes.

In discussions or debates, this argument serves to highlight the potential dangers of seemingly minor decisions, making it important for participants to consider the broader implications of their choices. The slippery slope also requires the speaker to connect the dots between the initial action and the subsequent potential outcomes convincingly, making it a compelling rhetorical strategy in advocacy and debate contexts.